"TAPlug"s for TAP::Harness
David E. Wheeler
david at kineticode.com
Thu Jun 11 15:45:15 GMT 2009
On Jun 11, 2009, at 6:39 AM, David Golden wrote:
>> Why? This is "test_requires", isn't it, rather than
>> so surely a regular dependency on TAP::Harness $whatever in a
>> would be good enough?
> If one needs a TAP::Harness aware EU::MM (or an M::B that makes
> TAP::Harness the default), then they need configure_requires.
I think it unlikely that EU::MM will ever be TAP::Harness aware. My
patch adding such support was rejected. Use Module::Build instead.
More information about the tapx-dev