Test::Harness features

[David Golden]

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Andy Armstrong<andy at hexten.net> wrote:
> Am I right in thinking that you're only advocating exposing an
> interface through Test::Harness because of other, extant parts of the
> tool chain that don't know about TAP::Harness?

Yes.  And I'd like to avoid Test/TAP::Harness and other parts of the
toolchain from becoming any more tightly coupled than they are
already.