Test::Harness features

[Eric Wilhelm]

# from David Golden
# on Tuesday 09 June 2009 14:40:

>The "problem" is that there has been no easy way to use
>anything other than TAP::Harness and there's been no way to extensibly
>provide arguments to the TAP::Harness constructor.

You're aware of `./Build test --tap-harness-args ...`, right?

Yes, there's no way to get it to call "Some::TAP::Harness->new(...)", 
but we should really be able to do everything without a subclass (if 
only because stacking subclasses is a PITA.)

--Eric
-- 
[...proprietary software is better than gpl because...] "There is value
in having somebody you can write checks to, and they fix bugs."
--Mike McNamara (president of a commercial software company)
---------------------------------------------------
    http://scratchcomputing.com
---------------------------------------------------