Test::Harness in Core
Andy Armstrong
andy at hexten.net
Tue Jun 9 15:45:05 GMT 2009
On 9 Jun 2009, at 14:13, Andy Armstrong wrote:
>> For example --- answer this quickly and without reading
>> documentation:
>> which of the options to prove are supported by HARNESS_OPTIONS?
>> Don't
>> know? Go look it up. Was there any well-thought-out reason for it?
>> Or just that no one bothered to keep the code in sync?
>
> HARNESS_OPTIONS was added after the fact to make it possible to run
> parallel tests when using the Test::Harness compatibility layer.
Which sounds like I'm defending it - but actually I just forgot the
next sentence...
So, yes, it's ad-hoc and I haven't taken the time time to keep it in
sync with anything else.
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
More information about the tapx-dev
mailing list