Test::Harness in Core

Andy Armstrong andy at hexten.net
Tue Jun 9 15:45:05 GMT 2009


On 9 Jun 2009, at 14:13, Andy Armstrong wrote:
>> For example --- answer this quickly and without reading  
>> documentation:
>> which of the options to prove are supported by HARNESS_OPTIONS?   
>> Don't
>> know?  Go look it up.  Was there any well-thought-out reason for it?
>> Or just that no one bothered to keep the code in sync?
>
> HARNESS_OPTIONS was added after the fact to make it possible to run
> parallel tests when using the Test::Harness compatibility layer.


Which sounds like I'm defending it - but actually I just forgot the  
next sentence...

So, yes, it's ad-hoc and I haven't taken the time time to keep it in  
sync with anything else.

-- 
Andy Armstrong, Hexten



More information about the tapx-dev mailing list