xdaveg at gmail.com
Mon Jun 1 14:21:14 GMT 2009
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Andy Armstrong <andy at hexten.net> wrote:
> On 1 Jun 2009, at 14:10, Michael Peters wrote:
>> Andy Armstrong wrote:
>>> I guess that could get its own top level project on GitHub - unless
>>> you think not?
>> No, I think it should be in the project as the others. It'll make it
>> easier for
>> it to track any necessary changes to TAP::Harness.
Could I suggest cleaning up the directory structure, then? So that
the "test-harness" project repository contains N distribution
directories? Along the lines of:
Since with git, you don't need branches/tags directories, this becomes
quite clean to work with.
More information about the tapx-dev