TAP::Parser should be easier to subclass [PATCH]

Andy Armstrong andy at hexten.net
Mon Jun 9 11:34:08 UTC 2008

Previous message: TAP::Parser should be *easier* to subclass [PATCH]
Next message: TAP::Parser should be *easier* to subclass [PATCH]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 9 Jun 2008, at 10:30, Steve Purkis wrote:
> *slaps forehead*
>
> Now that was pretty stupid ;-)

Not really :)

> It's on my laptop @ home, so I'll have to re-diff & send it when I  
> get back.  Apologies.

Cool, thanks.

-- 
Andy Armstrong, Hexten

Previous message: TAP::Parser should be *easier* to subclass [PATCH]
Next message: TAP::Parser should be *easier* to subclass [PATCH]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the tapx-dev mailing list