Replacing Test::Harness Classes

Andy Armstrong andy at hexten.net
Fri Aug 22 16:37:38 UTC 2008


On 22 Aug 2008, at 17:26, Ovid wrote:
> OK, we've had a bit of pain from time to time with overriding  
> Test::Harness classes.  Many people want to *easily* replace the  
> formatter.  I want to replace App::Prove::State.  Not being able to  
> do this has tremendously limited people's ability to customize  
> things.  If we take care of this before there's too much work to  
> override things the hard way, this might be straightforward.
>
> Currently I think this may be an option for .proverc, but we've  
> already documented its format.  Does anyone else have other  
> suggestions aside from adding really nasty command line switches?


Make your own version of prove?

-- 
Andy Armstrong, Hexten





More information about the tapx-dev mailing list