Replacing Test::Harness Classes
Andy Armstrong
andy at hexten.net
Fri Aug 22 16:37:38 UTC 2008
On 22 Aug 2008, at 17:26, Ovid wrote:
> OK, we've had a bit of pain from time to time with overriding
> Test::Harness classes. Many people want to *easily* replace the
> formatter. I want to replace App::Prove::State. Not being able to
> do this has tremendously limited people's ability to customize
> things. If we take care of this before there's too much work to
> override things the hard way, this might be straightforward.
>
> Currently I think this may be an option for .proverc, but we've
> already documented its format. Does anyone else have other
> suggestions aside from adding really nasty command line switches?
Make your own version of prove?
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
More information about the tapx-dev
mailing list