Profiling parallel tests
Andy Armstrong
andy at hexten.net
Fri Aug 22 13:39:01 UTC 2008
On 22 Aug 2008, at 13:58, Nicholas Clark wrote:
>> Correct. But I think it's worth clearing out the structures that
>> relate to tests that have completed too - otherwise get_any() still
>> has a lot of corpses to step over.
>
> There seems to already be some pruning in _find_next_job():
>
> # Prune any exhausted items.
> shift @$seq while @$seq && _is_empty( $seq->[0] );
>
> That's doing something different from what you're suggesting?
Dunno :)
My plan was to set up a little test rig to benchmark just the
scheduler and then proceed on the basis of whatever that throws up.
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
More information about the tapx-dev
mailing list