Plugins, API wars, parallelism, progress
Andy Armstrong
n at rciss.us
Thu Oct 4 22:01:55 BST 2007
Schwern's right. The way we're getting bogged down is symptomatic of
a need to release some code.
We don't have a finalized proposal for making our code pluggable but
I think it's reasonable to assume that whatever we settle on won't
require us to break or deprecate any/much of our current API. So
let's keep moving.
As soon as we test cleanly on Windows and VMS I want to release 2.99_03.
Then lets focus on 3.00 remembering that after 3.00 it's easy to add
features but hard to remove them.
Eric: I'm truly sorry if I've annoyed you. I can assure you it's not
personal. We clearly have philosophical differences on all sorts of
issues - the kind of stuff that I'm sure would make for a lively and
informative debate in the right context. And I'm sure one day we'll
meet and that debate will ensue - unless you punch me first :)
Just now though we need to get a release out. I believe the majority
view is that we're close, right?
Schwern: sorry - the VMS thing. As I keep saying if you can point me
at some instructions I don't mind firing up a testdrive account and
running the tests.
Ovid: you mentioned testing against a big slice of CPAN...
I *really* want to release 2.99_03 in the next 24 hours and then push
rapidly on to 3.00.
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
More information about the tapx-dev
mailing list