664, 668 - Getopt::Long
Andy Armstrong
n at rciss.us
Thu Oct 4 21:22:48 BST 2007
On 4 Oct 2007, at 21:15, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
> Forget that I ever said "plugins". Just tell me why we want to
> have to
> keep in mind that Getopt::Long breaks error handling and what
> justifies
> App::Prove calling exit() because of it.
I've just noticed this:
( App::Prove::Plugins->can('switches')
? App::Prove::Plugins->switches
: ()
),
and it's making it difficult to forget that you said "plugins" :)
We have three sub refs in the options hash. None of them need to be
there - that code can easily be refactored to avoid them. We're not -
as far as I know - planning to add more. We don't have any more of
problem with Getopt::Long than anyone else who uses it does. Ergo we
don't need to fix it.
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
More information about the tapx-dev
mailing list