xdaveg at gmail.com
Thu Oct 4 15:40:23 BST 2007
On 10/4/07, Ovid <publiustemp-tapx at yahoo.com> wrote:
> If we can think of something that better fits most people's
> understanding of OO, I think I'd be happy with that. (I'd *prefer*
> traits since they're the future, but not at the cost of confusing
> people who don't grok 'em).
At the risk of sending this discussion off the deep end, I wonder if
this might be the sort of thing that Moose is designed to help solve?
At the very least, regardless of the appropriateness of Moose, I'd
guess that Stevan Little might be able to offer some helpful
suggestions on pros/cons of different approaches.
More information about the tapx-dev