Test::Differences failure
Eric Wilhelm
scratchcomputing at gmail.com
Thu Oct 4 02:23:22 BST 2007
# from Michael G Schwern
# on Wednesday 03 October 2007 14:53:
>> $ perl -Ilib t/01text_vs_data.t
>> 1..3 todo 1 2 3;
>>
>> I'd say so. So /nearly/ nobody uses todo in plan...
>
>I'm going to patch Test.pm so it uses inline TODOs. That will
> eventually make the problem go away.
When is "eventually"?
So what does this mean for T::H 3.0 and "how much blows up" on release?
How many modules *depend* on the "nearly nobody" set?
I don't think anyone is smoking cpan against Test::Harness 2.99_0n.
Unless we plan to release a copy of the old T::H as 3.01 the day after,
I would be somewhat leery of throwing the switch and repeating the
Test::More 0.72 thing.
--Eric
--
The first rule about Debian is you don't talk about Debian
---------------------------------------------------
http://scratchcomputing.com
---------------------------------------------------
More information about the tapx-dev
mailing list