FAIL: Test report for TAP::Parser r669 (surly)

[Ovid]

--- Andy Armstrong <n at rciss.us> wrote:

> I'm not sure that testing against a minimally upgraded 5.5.4 is  
> really necessary...

It also bugs me because the new version of 00-load.t is vastly superior
to what we had and I'd hate for a faux bug to bite us.  We have to
leave the taint checking in there, so suggestions are welcome.

Cheers,
Ovid

--
Buy the book  - http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/
Perl and CGI  - http://users.easystreet.com/ovid/cgi_course/
Personal blog - http://publius-ovidius.livejournal.com/
Tech blog     - http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/