Parallel thoughts
Andy Armstrong
n at rciss.us
Tue Oct 2 11:34:35 BST 2007
On 2 Oct 2007, at 10:12, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
> The simple parser is still 3500% faster than the --fork -j 9.
> Given the
> complexity of the IPC and the growing complexity of Harness.pm with
> all
> of these embedded features (and it still has no nonblock mode for the
> gui subclass), I'm not liking the direction that things seem to be
> headed.
Well I agree completely - and I'm absolutely open to suggestions that
give us a much faster parser with a similarly usable interface. An
order of magnitude speed up would completely validate the
multiplexing approach I think.
> And for the dotreader test suite, the --fork slows it down by about
> 11%.
Oooh. I'll investigate.
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
More information about the tapx-dev
mailing list