On 2 Oct 2007, at 01:45, Michael G Schwern wrote: > It's interesting to note that --fork with only one process comes > out the same > as no forking at all, which is good in that it's what you'd expect > and forking > isn't adding significant overhead. Ah - there's logic so that --fork -j1 doesn't really fork. I should probably change that... -- Andy Armstrong, Hexten