[tapx-dev] Test::Harness 3.0 roadmap
Michael G Schwern
schwern at pobox.com
Tue Mar 13 09:21:31 GMT 2007
Ovid wrote:
> Interestingly, that's probably the number one issue. Here's a TODO
> list :)
>
> http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Dist/Display.html?Name=Test-Harness
>
> There are 65 items, many of them are spam. Andy, can you clear any of
> those or at least get rid of the spam?
Done.
>> * The one open ticket, 24728 is fixed. Could you mark it closed
>> please Curtis?
*snip*
> 'runtests' still spits out the diagnostic unless we include the '-q'
> switch. I do not think, with the current implementation, that we can
> "fix" this to exactly mimic the behavior of the current test harness.
> Mark it as 'resolved' but with said explanation?
How is that resolved? There's not even a work around. -q doesn't count
because...
Thu Feb 01 15:31:31 2007 MSCHWERN - Correspondence added
I tried --quiet but unfortunately it turns off diagnostics on both
STDOUT and on STDERR thus supressing failure output along with
informational output.
Its ok to leave a ticket open that you can't immediately fix. However, this
is going to be a big issue with Test::Harness 3.0. Comments going to STDOUT
do not and have never been displayed and suddenly there's going to be a
whole lot of noise that wasn't there before. IMO its a show stopper.
For some strange reason it doesn't apply to diagnostics coming from TODO
tests, just direct prints to STDOUT. Are there still Test::Builder
shenanigans going on inside TAP::Parser?
Anyhow, found another issue.
http://rt.cpan.org//Ticket/Display.html?id=25405
More information about the tapx-dev
mailing list