[tapx-dev] Thoughts about Test::Harness 3.0

[Andy Lester]

On Jun 7, 2007, at 12:32 PM, Shlomi Fish wrote:

>> * What exactly is not being done that should be being done?
>>
>
> What I believed was pointless was the fact that people are trying  
> to enhance
> Test::Harness by making it use TAP::Parser, while in my opinion it  
> should be
> in deep maintenance mode.

But what DO you want them working on?  Why does it matter that people  
are working on something that you don't like?  What DO you want them  
working on instead.

As it turns out, T::H 3.0 is going to use zero code from T::H 2.0.   
It's a non-issue.


> "One sentence". Can you summarise the works of Aristotle in one  
> sentence? Some
> things require a bit more than that.

Aristotle was a friend of mine.  Shlomi, you're no Aristotle.

If you want people to understand what it is you are trying to say,  
you need to be able to summarize effectively.

--
Andy Lester => andy at petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance