[tapx-dev] SKIP and TODO misparses

Andy Armstrong andy at hexten.net
Sun Jul 22 18:45:16 BST 2007


On 22 Jul 2007, at 18:42, Ovid wrote:
> That final SKIP should really be a skip because the hash mark is  
> not actually escaped.  However, both prove and runtests say that  
> it's not a skipped test.  This behavior seems incorrect, but  
> perhaps I'm misunderstanding.

Presumably my shiny new regex is borked :)

I'll have a look sometime this evening.

-- 
Andy Armstrong, hexten.net



More information about the tapx-dev mailing list