[tapx-dev] SKIP and TODO misparses
andy at hexten.net
Sun Jul 22 18:45:16 BST 2007
On 22 Jul 2007, at 18:42, Ovid wrote:
> That final SKIP should really be a skip because the hash mark is
> not actually escaped. However, both prove and runtests say that
> it's not a skipped test. This behavior seems incorrect, but
> perhaps I'm misunderstanding.
Presumably my shiny new regex is borked :)
I'll have a look sometime this evening.
Andy Armstrong, hexten.net
More information about the tapx-dev