[tapx-dev] Automated test report for TAP::Parser r226
mpeters at plusthree.com
Tue Aug 14 19:30:53 BST 2007
Andy Armstrong wrote:
> Indeed. I think we need to allow YAML blocks to be associated with
> the test as a whole rather than just individual assertions to get
> round that. Oops - another feature.
Which is what smolder optionally allows as part of the tap archive.
> I'm sure the archive idea is an excellent solution - it's obviously
> the best way to do it if you can't modify TAP syntax :)
So anyone object to me adding this as a option to runtests?
Plus Three, LP
More information about the tapx-dev