[tapx-dev] Broken coverage testing
Eric Wilhelm
scratchcomputing at gmail.com
Thu Aug 9 18:01:47 BST 2007
# from Andy Armstrong
# on Thursday 09 August 2007 06:27 am:
>When I chatted to Paul Johnson about it he seemed pretty convinced
>that it's a D::C bug. In a sense it must be a D::C bug - we're
>certainly not doing anything purposely to upset D::C - and D::C's job
> is to handle whatever we throw at it - within reason.
I suspect it might have something to do with the anonymous subs being
nested at multiple levels and/or subprocesses. But, I can't manage to
replicate it in any test scenario or other modules (IPC::Run,
dotReader, Module::Build, and a few others.)
>For clarification have you ever been able to get coverage for the
>whole test suite? I didn't attempt it until a couple of weeks ago and
> it was broken then.
Same here.
--Eric
--
"You can't win. You can't break even. You can't quit."
--Ginsberg's Restatement of the Three Laws of Thermodynamics
---------------------------------------------------
http://scratchcomputing.com
---------------------------------------------------
More information about the tapx-dev
mailing list