[tapx-dev] Broken coverage testing

[Ovid]

--- Leif Eriksen <leif.eriksen at bigpond.com> wrote:

> I'll try a D::C around 0.50 or so but I feel that D::C isn't
> the problem, I feel (with zero evidence) that T::P is doing 
> 'something' - I use D::C _all_ the time and nothing else is
> having this issue. I apologise if that gets people's hackles
> up, I am new here after all, but its just a feeling.

Historically D::C has had a few problems, but the only time I've hit
one is discovering that it breaks with lvalue accessors (which are
usually evil anyway).  So I suspect you're correct that it's something
unique to our code.

I do appreciate your work on this :)

Cheers,
Ovid

--
Buy the book  - http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/
Perl and CGI  - http://users.easystreet.com/ovid/cgi_course/
Personal blog - http://publius-ovidius.livejournal.com/
Tech blog     - http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/