[tapx-dev] Broken coverage testing

[Ovid]

--- leif.eriksen at hpa.com.au wrote:

> I'm pretty much dead in the water with increasing coverage if D::C
> doesn't play well with tapx,
> Its hard to measure and identify coverage if the tool doesn't work.

Hi Leif,

Well, right off the bat, I just want to say that I'm very grateful for
your help with what you've done so far.  We've needed this.  If you
have time, one possible solution is to do a binary search through
TAP::Parser releases to figure out where the problem occurs and then
check diffs.

If you don't have time for this, no worries.  You've already been a
huge help and one of us will get to it.

Andy, Eric:  I've taken some serious steps to free up some of my other
obligations.  While there's a bit of luck involved in it happening soon
enough for my taste, I hope to actually get some other things sorted so
that I have the energy to return to TAP::Parser more regularly.  Right
now, my burnout level is so high that at times I struggle to even get
email written.

Cheers,
Ovid

--
Buy the book  - http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/
Perl and CGI  - http://users.easystreet.com/ovid/cgi_course/
Personal blog - http://publius-ovidius.livejournal.com/
Tech blog     - http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/